bAndersen wrote: snip...
I do understand your point Ed, and I very much appreciate your patience and continued posts. Frankly, I think those that need to differentiate between the ESAP and SAP will always find something to carp about. No matter what, a two hour thermal task is no small feat. We will just have to disagree on this point. Also, be reminded that the current AMA/ALES rules do allow restarts with a zero round penalty. By that logic, contests using AMA/ALES rules would be seen as lesser than. It's not that big a deal to me, I just don't want to put a $2K glider at unnecessary risk.
I don't agree with you on the contests. A contest is a measure of one pilot's ability against other pilots under a common set of rules and conditions. What those rules are are not the measure of the pilot's final standing in the contest, it is how he stands compared to the other pilots who flew under the same rules and conditions.
If you look at the SAP competition section it states what kinds of contests qualify but says nothing about the specifc or unique nature of the rules of the contest, local ground rules or special features of the contest.
www.silentflight.org/index.php/lsf-program/lsf-tasks
One of the LSF officers may wish to weigh in on my interpretation of the SAP below.
You could fly a winch contest for points or for the win. I could fly a slope contest for points or for the win. Both our contests qualify under SAP with no distinction or valuation of one being "better" than the other.
You could fly a hi-start based contest with 100 inch landing tapes at 1 point per inch. I could fly a winch based contest with a runway landing task. Both would qualify and both would be equal under the SAP definitions.
As far as I understand the SAP rules for contests, I can fly F3J for contest credit and F3J allows relaunches. I can fly hand launch contests under the SAP program and relaunches are standard procedure there.
So I don't see any "lesser" based on whether a contest allows restarts with a zero for restart. It is not relevant under the contest section of SAP so I would not expect it to be relevant under the contest section of eSAP.
The ability to restart the motor would only be relevant under tasks for eSAP, as I see it.
As for not putting a $2K glider at unnecessary risk, I am with you. This is one of the reasons so few people achieve Level IV or Level V under the SAP. Either the cost is too high, the effort is too high or the risk is too high.
But if you want the recognition and to be treated as an equal for your accomplishments, then you have to be willing to pay the price, put in the effort and take the risk. If it was safe and easy everyone would be level V.